Skip to content
be sonatural, Face masks, read from the back

The longest lists here

Masks we group for barrier repair

The longest lists of the shelves with a page here, running well above the catalogue's median. Yet length does not crowd out restraint: this shelf also leaves fragrance off the list, and stays clear of the pregnancy flag, more often than any of the others here. It is also where most of the catalogue's overnight masks have ended up.

In the catalogue
63from 39 brands
Median per use
€1.80€0.23-€10.00
Median list length
3115-65 entries
Fragrance-free
34of 63

Prices are indicative, captured once from the source recorded on each product page, and they drift. 20 of the 63 per-use figures are estimated from pack size at a typical application rather than counted off a sheet count.

The cheapest application here is Balea Gesichtsmaske Aloe Vera €0.23, 21 entries and the dearest Dr. Barbara Sturm Face Mask ≈€10.00, 18 entries.

“Masks we group for barrier repair” means we grouped these masks by reading what each sets out to do and what its formula suggests - not a phrase copied off the pack, and not a claim that any of them will help with a compromised skin barrier. What is counted below is the ingredient list.

The short read

  • These are the longest lists of the shelves with a page here, well above the catalogue's median - though not the longest of every concern in the catalogue, and the table below shows which are longer. A mask grouped here tends to read as a longer formula, not a shorter one.

  • The grouping is ours: a mask is here because its stated purpose and its formula point at a compromised skin barrier, not because we found the words “barrier repair” on the box.

  • The shelf with the longest lists is also the most restrained of these four on two readings at once: more of it leaves fragrance off the list, and more of it carries nothing the encyclopaedia flags to check in pregnancy, than any of the others here.

  • Most of the catalogue's overnight masks sit here, and the rest of the shelf is sheet-heavy with cream and hydrogel behind it. A formula you leave on all night is a different problem from one you rinse off, and the format mix below is where that shows.

What these lists print that others do not

Not the most common ingredients - water is on nearly every list ever written and tells you nothing about who a mask is for. These are the entries that appear far more often on this shelf than across the 219 masks as a whole, counted by encyclopaedia entry rather than by printed name. A name appearing here is a reading of the label, not a statement that it does anything.

Well tolerated
No meaningful concern for most people; irritation is possible but rare.
What the levels mean ↗

Names without a link have no encyclopaedia entry yet, so we make no claim about them beyond the count.

The sixteen concerns side by side

The dataset sorts masks into 16 concerns, and 4 have a page. One is excluded by the 50% ceiling, because a page over that much of the catalogue is the catalogue with a new heading, and two fall under the floor of 13. Most of the rest are already published under another heading - every oil-control mask is on the oily skin page, every firmness mask on the mature skin page - and re-heading our own indexed shelf is worse than re-heading the catalogue; the build recomputes every one of those overlaps and refuses a page that crosses 85%. Two clear every mechanical test and are left out on a judgement instead, both sitting close to the catalogue baseline on price and list length, and neither is excluded for good. Every figure here is counted across all of them, so the superlatives above are scoped to something you can check.

Masks, share of the catalogue, median price per use, median ingredient count and fragrance-free count, by concern
ConcernMasksMedian per useMedian listFragrance-free
Hydrationno page15470%€1.882854 of 154
Barrier repair6329%€1.803134 of 63
Poresno page5626%€1.212322 of 56
Blackheadsno page2511%€1.142010 of 25
Breakoutsno page2110%€1.752311 of 21
Oil controlno page4521%€1.332319 of 45
Brightening3616%€1.9729.515 of 36
Dark spotsno page94%€4.73337 of 9
Dullnessno page7434%€1.952726 of 74
Rednessno page2411%€1.5526.515 of 24
Soothingno page7936%€1.752638 of 79
Fine linesno page5826%€2.1027.519 of 58
Firmnessno page2110%€3.94326 of 21
Texture3717%€1.452411 of 37
Exfoliation209%€1.1323.59 of 20
Anti-pollutionno page21%€1.9918.51 of 2

A mask is usually grouped under more than one concern, so the columns do not sum to 219. The grouping is ours throughout, read from what each mask sets out to do and what its formula suggests.

What these labels print

Seven readings of the ingredient list, each counted the same way across this shelf and across the whole catalogue, so the second column is the baseline the first is worth reading against. Every one of them is a statement about what is printed on a pack - not about what a mask does, and not a verdict on any of them. The pregnancy flag in particular is a reason to read a list rather than a warning: it marks a mask carrying something the encyclopaedia says to check, which is a different thing from a mask being unsafe.

Fragrance, essential oil, drying alcohol, pregnancy flag, parfum, declared allergen and vegan counts, for this shelf and for the whole catalogue
ReadingHereCatalogue
Fragrance-free34 of 6354%80 of 21937%
No essential oil53 of 6384%182 of 21983%
No drying alcohol58 of 6392%173 of 21979%
Nothing flagged in pregnancy47 of 6375%147 of 21967%
Prints parfum21 of 6333%120 of 21955%
Names an allergen19 of 6330%81 of 21937%
Recorded vegan17 of 6327%60 of 21927%

Vegan status is unrecorded for 40 of the 63 masks here, so that row counts only the packs where we found it stated - unrecorded is not the same as not vegan. How far into a list we can read is its own reading: the encyclopaedia has an entry for a median of 81% of each list here, against 82% across the catalogue. The rest is printed in names the site cannot yet decode, and an undecoded name is one we make no claim about either way - what we do not know.

Which formats these are

A format is the plainest thing about a mask that is not on its ingredient list - what you buy it in and how you use it - and it explains a good deal of what the readings above look like. A shelf of pots and tubes carries longer, oilier lists than a shelf of sachets, and its price per use is worked out rather than counted.

Formats without a link have too few masks in the catalogue to carry a page of their own.

All 63 masks we group for barrier repair

Cheapest use first. Every one is on sale in the EU and has a published ingredient list we could source and check.


Read another shelf

The other concerns with a page

The same catalogue also groups by skin type - oily, sensitive, mature and acne-prone - which is a different cut of the same 215 lists.

Nothing on this page is a paid placement and no link here is an affiliate link - see how this site is paid for. To narrow this shelf by price, format or what you want kept out, filter the full catalogue.